One of manyThe struggle itself is enough to fill a man's heart.
Albert Camus, The Myth of Sisyphus
calvin_h
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit calvin_h's Xanga Site!

Interests: Pseudonyms. So fascinating.
Expertise: Creating multiple xangas for my multiple personalities.
Occupation: Citizen
Industry: USA, Inc


Message: message meEmail: email me


Member Since: 3/1/2003

SubscriptionsSites I Read

Blogrings
NOVA / MD headz - Join if your in the area biatch!
previous - random - next

[University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign]
previous - random - next

Young Professionals
previous - random - next

i belong in california
previous - random - next

George Washington University
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Tuesday, April 28, 2009

MR. CAB DRIVER (Lenny Kravitz Song) Don't U Like the Color of my Skin?


Lenny Kravitz, who had a white dad and black mom, was raised by his mother who told him "people will see you as a black man" so get used to it. Barack Obama's mother could have told her son the same.

But then you have the Eugene Robinson's, black men themselves, who are pretty myopic themselves in seeing race. Writing on Obama:

"Not even three months have passed since President Obama's historic inauguration, and already it tends to slip the nation's collective mind that the first black president of the United States is, in fact, black. There may be hope for us after all."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/02/AR2009040203286.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

Sir,

The fact that you (and many others) continue to think of race-based issues through black-or-white lens, e.g., Barack as the first "black president" (Tiger as a "black" pro golfer), without acknowledgment of other racial minorities or mixed-race Americans (e.g., Barack and Tiger), only proves how much further we still have to go.

You also refer, ironically, to Eric Holder's speech, in which the AG talks of how America is still de facto racially segregated. I think the AG would agree that true progress would be when we see beyond the black-or-white racial paradigm and celebrate the fact that we have elected, not the first "black" president, but a bi-racial president.

=================

It seems far less unusual to me that there are enough Americans today willing to vote into the Presidency an intelligent charismatic guy who happens to look black (and is half-black), than it is that decades ago a white woman would, despite stereotypes or social pressure, marry a Kenyan.


Tuesday, December 19, 2006

Nate Krissoff, and many others.


 

Then-lance corporal Edwardo J. Lopez was my first defense client when I was assigned to trial defense back in April 2006. Captain Winchell, then the Senior Defense Counsel, who would be leaving the Marine Corps in May, gave me Lopez's file. 

               

Lopez, an 0311 rifleman with Second Battalion, Third Marines (2/3 – "two-three"), was being charged with a single "112-alpha" spec (Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, "wrongful use of controlled substance") at a special court-martial, where maximum confinement would be one year, and the conviction equivalent to a federal conviction. Specifically, he had tested positive on a urinalysis for valium.

 

It would be a easy "summary court board waiver" deal – if the marine agreed to plea guilty at summary court-martial -- where the maximum confinement time was 30 days, and the conviction would remain a note in the marine's military record and not follow him into his civilian life – in addition to waiving his right to an "administrative separation board" (essentially the Marine Corps' way of firing marines, but providing the marine the right to appear before a 3-member panel to argue their case and appropriate characterization of service if discharged), the convening authority would withdraw the charge against Lopez at the special court-martial.

 

Lopez insisted he was innocent.

 

The only way he could have "popped positive," Lopez told me, was from the pills that another Marine, Lance Corporal Machado, gave him on the plane.  They were literally on the plane sitting on the tarmac, in Afghanistan, about to return home from deployment.  Lopez told me that he had photos of him and other Marines playing in the snow outside the plane before they left, and that the cold from the snow had actually made his knees stiff and sore.  His knees had already gotten progressively sore while deployed in Afghanistan, humping up and down mountains in combat gear on patrol. Lopez said that Machado was sitting next to him on the plane, and had turned to offer him some pills from a bottle, saying "Here, take these. It'll help you go to sleep."  He asked Machado what the pills were, and Machado had told him that they were painkillers, so Lopez figured they would help the pain in his knees as well, and took two of them.

 

Maybe I was too new to the game, but I believed Lopez. He seemed like a good kid to me. I wanted to contest the case.  Captain Winchell thought otherwise, and made the comment to Lopez that "new defense counsel may want to get some courtroom experience, but a summary board waiver is a good deal for you."

 

Lopez still hesitated. He didn't want to waive his right to an administrative separations board. He was worried that he would be separated from the Marine Corps, even after serving his sentence. "Sir," he emphasized to me, "I want to be able to go back on the next deployment with my platoon."

 

That was really all Lopez wanted. He was willing to serve time and plea guilty, but he could not imagine leaving, or being left behind by, his buddies for the next deployment, to Iraq, in October 2006.

 

I  talked to Lopez's staff non-commissioned officer (SNCO), his platoon sergeant, staff sergeant Rauda.  SSgt Rauda supported Lopez, and thought he was a good marine, too.  But SSgt Rauda also told me that "Lopez, he hung around too much with those other guys who all popped," including Palomares, aka, "candyman" (Palomares was eventually found not guilty at trial for distribution, but pled guilty to wrongful use of valium).

 

Lopez was torn. He asked me to call his mother to better explain to her what was going on. He described his mother as his best friend.  I remembered the 630 area code for DuPage Country, Illinois, a Chicago suburb, since I had gone to the University of Illinois. And I remember Martha Lopez asking me, "Lieutenant Lee, how long have you been doing this?"

 

LCpl Lopez pled guilty without having to waive his right to an administrative separation board.  Even while serving time in the brig, I would receive phone calls from Lopez.  "Sir, have you heard anything about my adsep board?"  "Is the command going to try and separate me?"  All Lopez wanted, was to return to his platoon. He could not imagine leaving, or being left behind, by his buddies.

 

One day, I received a message on my answering machine.  It was Lopez again.

 

"Hey Sir, I've gotten out of the brig. They're not separating me! I just want to come by your office and drop off paperwork they gave me. Just so you can make sure."  The battalion commanding officer had, in fact, recommended that Lopez not be administratively separated.  Lopez had not waived his right to appear before a board, but given the C.O.'s recommendation, that would no longer be necessary.  2/3 was taking Lopez to Iraq.

 

I did not see Lopez when he came by to drop off the papers with the C.O.'s recommendation.  I called him afterwards, just to tell him that everything looked "good to go," and to wish him "good luck."

 

I didn't think of Lopez much after that.  I became detailed defense counsel to many more Marines, and the names and faces began to blur. I stopped believing what many of them said to me, and their proclamations of innocence.  Sometimes, I felt that I was playing a dual role – holding their hands as their defense counsel, but at the same time, trying to smack sense into the young knuckleheads as an officer.

 

Names and faces began to blur.

 

So it was, too, perhaps, with the growing list of KIA's in the "Global War Against Terrorism," as Joseph Stalin once put it – "one death is a tragedy; one million is a statistic."  I suspected this Stalinism to be mostly true for the majority of the American population, where less than two percent of the population carries nearly all of our nation's burden in fighting the war. We put yellow "support our troops" bumper stickers on our cars, but for the most part, our everyday concerns revolve around something like the last episode of Grey's Anatomy. Most of us are simply too far removed from the fight for it to really mean anything, when it isn't actually our own father, our own brother, our own sister, our own children deployed in harms way ...

 

Even myself – clicking on the "breaking headlines" link on the Honolulu Advertiser's online webpage.  I knew the word that Iraqi snipers had begun targeting officers. They had shot and killed 2ndLt Josh Booth a week earlier.  But even though we were fellow officers, I never knew Josh personally.  To me, he had a name, but not a face.  It was with more of a passing curiosity, perhaps, than genuine concern, that I wondered if another insurgent sniper had killed a marine officer.  I knew that my roommate from Basic School, had just returned from Ramadi. I knew that Lt Nguyen, who had in fact had been shot by a sniper a few weeks earlier, was lucky and now rehabbing stateside at Bethesda Medical.  Then I read the short blurb to the "breaking news."

 

 

 

 

 • 

Kane`ohe Bay Marine killed in Iraq (Posted at 9:24 a.m.)

 

 

Posted at 9:24 a.m., Tuesday, October 24, 2006

Kane`ohe Bay Marine killed in Iraq

Advertiser Staff

 

The Department of Defense announced today the death of a Kane`ohe Bay Marine killed in Iraq.

 

Pvt. Edwardo J. Lopez, 21, of Aurora, Ill., died Oct. 19 while conducting combat operations in Al Anbar province, Iraq.

 

He was assigned to 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, 3rd Marine Division, III Marine Expeditionary Force, Kane`ohe Bay, Hawai`i.

 

 

 

 

 

Edwardo J. Lopez.

 

Aurora, Ill.

 

2nd Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment.

 

 

 

Then I remembered not just the name, but also the face.

 

And I remembered stories about Marines playing in the snow while waiting for their flight back home after a 6 month deployment.

 

And I remembered the voice of a concerned mother, and the awkwardness of possibly informing her of just how inexperienced her son's detailed counsel was.

 

And I remembered how the most important thing for a young marine was, in the end, to be there with his fellow marines.

 

 

I am often asked how, as defense counsel, I can stand to oftentimes counsel, advise, and represent the young Marines that seem to habitually get into trouble again, and again.

 

Perhaps it has to do with my definition of what it is to be a hero.

 

A hero is not a perfect person. A hero will have his or her flaws, shortcomings, and failings. Or we would have no heroes, only saints.  Instead, the defining essence of a hero is an extraordinary commitment to extraordinary sacrifice. Lopez had that commitment – and on 19 October 2006, six thousand five hundred miles from home, all of twenty-one years old, he sacrificed his life.

 


Wednesday, August 09, 2006

crime and punishment and high school chemistry projects

Marines charged with violations under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) like to complain how Lance Corporal So-and-so is only getting hit with this-or-that lesser punishment compared to what they are facing or have been sentenced to. So I tell them about my high school chemistry project with Patrick Fei.

Patrick Fei and I were partners for Mr. Crull's freshman chemistry project. We built this volcano-like contraption that was going to spew smoke and gas the likes never seen since Mt. Vesuvius.  After demonstrations of all the projects in the class, we received our grades for our project.  Patrick had received a 100, but I had gotten a 70.  Neither of us understood why the discrepancy.  I was just going to let it slide; whatever.  Patrick insisted on sticking up for me, grabbing my report (which was identical to his, except for the "70" on the top right corner instead of a "100"), and running up to Mr. Crull with it.

Mr. Crull took a look at Patrick's 100, and my 70.  Then he said something to me like, "What's the problem with you? Can't open your own mouth when you see something wrong?"  Total jackass, racist teacher.  Then he turned to both Patrick and myself and said, "Oh yeah.  I remember.  Your project didn't work."  In fact, our volcano did not spew smoke and gas the likes never seen since Mt. Vesuvius, or even Mt. Snow Bunny Hill.

Regardless, what Mr. Crull did next was take his red pen, draw a line across the "100" on Patrick's report, and write a "70" on it instead.

The point is, and I tell these mostly 19, 20 year-old Marines: stop worrying about what others are getting.  If they are getting less than you, it isn't because YOU deserve less.  They are getting off light because they are lucky (. . .  or because they didn't also pop positive on a urinalysis, or have a litany of 6105 counseling entries). 

Bottom-line, moral of the story:  Just SHUT THE FUCK UP.


Friday, July 28, 2006

The difficulties of life are to make us better -- not bitter.

van gundy basketball philosophies

"It goes beyond adversity. This is an attitude situation. If there is adversity, so what? Anybody can be great when it's going good. There is no tough set of circumstances. We were very weak-minded when it came to dealing with our situation tonight." -- Coach Jeff Van Gundy, on the uninspired play of the injury-depleted Houston Rockets, after losing badly to the Denver Nuggets.

"You can either ... give in to the frustration that encompasses it all or enjoy the game." (After another bad loss, this time to the Golden State Warriors.)


9 Then his wife said to him, "Do you still hold fast your integrity? Curse God and die!"

10 But he said to her, "You speak as one of the foolish women speaks. (A)Shall we indeed accept good from God and not accept adversity?"


Saturday, July 22, 2006

Essay
Does Fatherhood Make You Happy?
By DANIEL GILBERT

Jun. 19, 2006

Sonora Smart Dodd was listening to a sermon on self-sacrifice when she decided that her father, a widower who had raised six children, deserved his very own national holiday. Almost a century later, people all over the world spend the third Sunday in June honoring their fathers with ritual offerings of aftershave and neckties, which leads millions of fathers to have precisely the same thought at precisely the same moment: "My children," they think in unison, "make me happy."

Could all those dads be wrong?

Studies reveal that most married couples start out happy and then become progressively less satisfied over the course of their lives, becoming especially disconsolate when their children are in diapers and in adolescence, and returning to their initial levels of happiness only after their children have had the decency to grow up and go away. When the popular press invented a malady called "empty-nest syndrome," it failed to mention that its primary symptom is a marked increase in smiling.

. . .

Our children give us many things, but an increase in our average daily happiness is probably not among them. Rather than deny that fact, we should celebrate it. Our ability to love beyond all measure those who try our patience and weary our bones is at once our most noble and most human quality. The fact that children don't always make us happy--and that we're happy to have them nonetheless--is the fact for which Sonora Smart Dodd was so grateful. She thought we would all do well to remember it, every third Sunday in June.



Next 5 >>